Production Planning

Assembly Line

Using ML For Improved Fab Scheduling

πŸ“… Date:

✍️ Author: Katherine Derbyshire

πŸ”– Topics: Production Planning, Machine Learning

🏭 Vertical: Semiconductor

🏒 Organizations: GlobalFoundries


The exact number of available tools for each step varies as tools are taken offline for maintenance or repairs. Some steps, like diffusion furnaces, consolidate multiple lots into large batches. Some sequences, like photoresist processing, must adhere to stringent time constraints. Lithography cells must match wafers with the appropriate reticles. Lot priorities change continuously. Even the time needed for an individual process step may change, as run-to-run control systems adjust recipe times for optimal results.

At the fab level, machine learning can support improved cycle time prediction and capacity planning. At the process cell or cluster tool level, it can inform WIP scheduling decisions. In between, it can facilitate better load balancing and order dispatching. As a first step, though, all of these applications need accurate models of the fab environment, which is a difficult problem.

The GlobalFoundries group demonstrated the effectiveness of neural network methods for time constraint tunnel dispatching. The relationship between input parameters and cycle time is complex and non-linear. As discussed above, machine learning methods are especially useful in situations like this, where statistical data is available but exact modeling is difficult.

Read more at Semiconductor Engineering

The setup matrix for production optimization

πŸ“… Date:

πŸ”– Topics: Production Planning


A setup matrix is a powerful tool for detailed optimization of production for recurring lots of similar or identical products. The challenge is to determine the transition times from one product to the next with sufficient precision and to provide the data for a planning system.

Read more at OEE AI Blog

The Benefits of Production Stabilization and the Sorcery of the Product Wheel

πŸ“… Date:

✍️ Author: Hugh Walters

πŸ”– Topics: Production Changeover, Production Planning

🏒 Organizations: Chainalytics


Volatile demand is everywhere, and companies facing it typically choose between two options: One, attempt to meet demand as it arises (chasing the volatility). Two, maintain a certain inventory level as a buffer from volatility. Of course, there are situations where option one is viable, but option two is the one that most companies take. Still, pursuing the benefits of production stabilization, even in this environment, is worth the effort.

The product wheel is a framework for consuming capacity by making specific products – on a particular asset, in fixed quantities – over a defined time horizon. Therefore, the ability to populate the wheels with products that can conform to smooth production is essential. Determining which products work with this strategy and which don’t is an analytical effort requiring product segmentation, statistical forecasting, replenishment policy selection, and inventory parameter development.

Read more at Chainalytics Blog

The Next Revolution: Industry 4.0 in the Intelligent Enterprise

πŸ“… Date:

✍️ Author: Sunita Mathur

πŸ”– Topics: Production Planning

🏒 Organizations: SAP


Which companies benefit from being able to automatically control the entire supply chain through machines and sensors?

β€œAuto-control” management means saving effort in manual processes along the entire supply chain and realizing the full potential of intelligent machines and sensors. Businesses in Europe in particular are creating opportunities here – their strength is traditionally more in customer-centric manufacturing, rather than mass production. However, standard products also benefit from flexibility. The global crisis of supply and logistics poses challenges for every manufacturer. Only those who dynamically parameterize production to deploy alternative materials and processes at the push of a button will win the global race for capacity and resources.

Read more at SAP Blogs

Part Level Demand Forecasting at Scale

πŸ“… Date:

✍️ Authors: Max Kohler, Pawarit Laosunthara, Bryan Smith, Bala Amavasai

πŸ”– Topics: Demand Planning, Production Planning, Forecasting

🏒 Organizations: Databricks


The challenges of demand forecasting include ensuring the right granularity, timeliness, and fidelity of forecasts. Due to limitations in computing capability and the lack of know-how, forecasting is often performed at an aggregated level, reducing fidelity.

In this blog, we demonstrate how our Solution Accelerator for Part Level Demand Forecasting helps your organization to forecast at the part level, rather than at the aggregate level using the Databricks Lakehouse Platform. Part-level demand forecasting is especially important in discrete manufacturing where manufacturers are at the mercy of their supply chain. This is due to the fact that constituent parts of a discrete manufactured product (e.g. cars) are dependent on components provided by third-party original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). The goal is to map the forecasted demand values for each SKU to quantities of the raw materials (the input of the production line) that are needed to produce the associated finished product (the output of the production line).

Read more at Databricks Blog